Gravitational “Anomalies” Caused by Shapiro Delayed Traveling Energy Quanta Around Galactic and Cosmic Scale Structures

Abstract.  In 1964, Irwin Shapiro pointed out that electromagnetic waves traveling near a gravitational well of a star were delayed due to relativistic Gravitational Time Dilation (GTD). This paper proposes that traveling energy quanta (mainly vacuum energy and gravitational waves, as well as neutrinos, electromagnetic waves, cosmic rays, stellar winds, and all other kinds of waves and relativistic particles yet to be discovered) accumulate in a Density Wave like mechanism around the galactic and cosmic scale structures because of Shapiro Delay. Ultimately, the accumulative effect is a substantial increase in energy density when seen from frames of reference far from the regions where it occurs. The higher energy density is imperceptible for an observer within its own frame of reference since the proposed mechanism nature is relativistic. The higher concentration of travelling energy quanta around galaxies and galaxy clusters is creating extra gravitational distortion in spacetime with its mass equivalent.Ramen EquationThe Relativistically Accumulated Mass Equivalent Mechanism (RAMEN), using the equation above, matches without free parameters the tested local group galaxy rotation curves for all orbits using the same traveling energy density value. The paper proposes how all observations of “Dark Matter” can be easily explained by RAMEN. It predicts the existence of a Universe Traveling Energy Density in disagreement by several orders of magnitude with currently accepted Universe Critical Energy Density. The paper discusses how the Casimir Effect experiments directly confirm with less than 5% disagreement with Quantum Field Theory the existence of higher energy densities in the vacuum. It also discusses how we may have misunderstood the nature of the predominant form of energy in the universe and that have prevented us from understanding the gravitational anomalies attributed to “Dark Matter”.

To continue reading use this link to download pdf:

https://1drv.ms/b/s!AtzwZU8adFtMhYpvfed9kp-BZwMVag

Link to download the worksheet file:

https://1drv.ms/x/s!AtzwZU8adFtMhYpxZqJEGN9GVqX0JQ

55 thoughts on “Gravitational “Anomalies” Caused by Shapiro Delayed Traveling Energy Quanta Around Galactic and Cosmic Scale Structures

  1. Hello Gregorio.

    Are you aware of the Radial Acceleration Relation (RAR)?

    https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.05917

    This paper talks about a strong correlation between the observed radial acceleration of many galaxies and that due to their baryonic content. The empirical relation follows from a minimum of assumptions (the Poisson equation, and a simple light-to-mass conversion), so dark matter models are unnecessary, as the distribution of dark matter can be written entirely in terms of baryons.

    As the paper states, possible interpretations for the Radial Acceleration Relation fall into three broad categories.

    1. It represents the end product of galaxy formation.
    2. It represents new dark sector physics that leads to the observed coupling.
    3. It is the result of new dynamical laws rather than dark matter.

    The paper is very simple to follow and understand, and the RAR plots are undeniable.

    I think that if you are able to get the same kind of plot from the Energy Felt Hypothesis, then you’re not only giving your analysis much more credibility (the conclusions of this paper are valid for 153 galaxies of different kinds), but also giving the RAR a theoretical explanation! (your hypothesis would fall straight into category 3).

    In any case, fascinating stuff.

    Like

  2. Hey ENERGY`s Drs , what is it happening with your?
    Why do you do not have done you homework that i request you in
    4.1 U, New Time Theory…point h. Question 13?
    Do you do not know to do?

    Well, i will try to help you with another easy question:

    Suppose you live in the Moon (forget The Earth for the moment)
    Suppose in The Moon:
    a. The time it is eternal because Moon does not rotate
    b. Suppose Moon rotate (synchronic) 27,3 days of The Earth
    Suppose A = 300.000,oo Km

    Case a.

    How can we measure (estimate) c velocity of the light if time it is eternal?
    (second of the Moon = zero)
    Well, i suppose that c = A/second-Moon = A/zero = infinity, right?

    Case b.

    Using same logical, then:
    c = 300.000,00 Km / 0,03660094 sec-Moon = 8.196.510 Km/ sec-Moon, right?
    where 1 sec-earth = 0,03550094 sec-moon

    In both cases a & b, how did you measure NASA-Moon-Rovers velocity?

    Case c.

    Suppose you tired to live in Moon and in consecuence you move to Mars
    (Are you happy to live (hypothetical) in Moon and Mars?
    Do not make concrete that…now you can travels to past and future…i am sure that
    You only has to pay me “one handful of dollars” (do you remember Eastwood movie?)
    (Not for your my ENERGY`s friends, it is for another…NASA; ESA; Space X, ISA, Mr Russian Astronaut, etc)

    Using similar reasoning to Mars:
    c = 307.916,67 Km/sec-Mars, where 1 sec-Earth = 0,9742896 sec-Mars
    Homework: to do same exercises to rest of planet…

    Well ENERGY`s friends, my simple question it is:
    14. Question FOURTEEN to ENERGY FELT…
    Can we tell that c, Speed of the Light is it relative???
    Is it Einstein`s theories, in consecuence, one complete fraud?
    Remember: reason very well you answer, how the old times when you was student…
    (imagine i am you teacher…)
    Answer Right: xxx win ONE dollar
    Answer Wrong xxx lost ONE millions dollar
    xxx: others, not ENERGY`friends

    No more for the moment ENERGY`s friends, i will appreciate very much your comments…

    Like

    1. The time on the Moon is not eternal. Moon rotates around the Earth in 27.3 Earth’s days. That means that 13.65 Earth days is a day on the Moon and equal time is a night. Sun position observed from both, Earth and Moon is the same. The differences are marginal and come from Moon’s rotation around the Earth. Also “movement” of stars on Moon’s “sky” is noticeable due to Moon to Earth position changes. Thus there would be possible perception of time. And if so an invention of time fraction like a second an so on. And finally, what we observe from Earth as phases of the Moon is actually a moving shed of Sun light which means we observe sunrise and dusk on the Moon from distance of 300 000 km.

      Like

  3. homepage – http://trends.newsgater.com/index.php?qa=user&qa_1=closeounce1 – Consume
    adequate amount of nutrients, including fibers that reduce cholesterol levels, heart-healthy nuts,
    fishes, and low-fat dairy abundant with calcium. It is significant that you oversee the
    kids when they’re brushing their teeth. So
    far, exercise and balanced diets are viewed as two of the key factors contributing to strong and healthy body.

    more info – http://prince.org/profile/tim3kingm

    Like

    1. Attacheds files it is new attempt to show your novels theories about Gravity vs. Temperature Relation, and in addition, New Universal Time Concept Number PI Based.

      I hope it will be useful for your…

      I hope also that, in my condition of “venezolano” people, your understand why i am trying “to sale” that scientifics information (for example NASA, ESA, Space X, COSMOS, JAXA, ISRO, etc)

      Do not doubt to contact to me if it is interesting to your…

      The following it is typical e.mail to possibles buyers…

      “June 02/2019

      Drs…

      Do not make concrete to travel Moon, Mars…

      Travel to past and future!

      Ramon Garcia Cell phones: +58 424 6879174 From my loved Cabimas, Venezuela”

      Like

  4. Dear Drs,

    After think it, i taked decision to send your my scientific job about gravity temperature connection My only hope, is obtain from your comments, councils, courtesy reply, others that can help me how “to sale” my job, considering i live in Venezuela, one third world country, been governing by very very bad persons.

    Please, read very good the followings electronic pages that it is themself explicatives.

    Please, if your conclusion is that me am wrong, let me know too…

    My best respects & regards,

    Ramon Garcia @mgmecuation

    Like

  5. Marvellous, very nice words & logicals senses…but can common citizen understand it? And pardon me but…why Big Scientifics of Big Countrys does it seem to ignore that “Nature Love Temperature”?…Why do you are persistent in connect gravity forces with mass, one theory dating from XV century? Has your thought that gravity can be one variants & punctuate force depending of temperature? Will it be that novel theory, the new physics that your are looking for? Could be that novel theory, easy, single so commun citizen can understand it?
    Can Universe Expansion be explained with that novel theory, where gravity force is not exerting attraction between galaxies cause her extremaly hight temperature and therefore Dark Matter & Energy has not reason to exist? Then galaxies will continue her expansion erractics, blind, lonely, no nature enemy trip accross the space, up to her owner destruction when two or more of them to meeting fortuitous and BANG…similar destiny of pelican species of the Earth…

    And if gravity it is variants, punctuate forces depending of temperature, at which forces it will be submited humans species & cold and hot blood species, for instance?

    And…superconductor behavior also could be explained?

    And what happening with our brother Mars planet? Perhaps, spontaneous floating dust & storm also could be explained…similar planet Mercury smoot, peaks and rough (chasms) surface…

    In another side, how do your be sure of your space accuracy measurements if your do not know what suppose Dark Matter & Energy is it & how is it influencing in your measurements?
    What is it numerical, mathematicals resulteds coming from space-time theory, for instance? Are your and me bending space-time near Earth surface? What will it be with NASA Parker Solar Prove when it is “near” Sun surface? Massive mass Sun vs. very, very small PSP mass is it bending space-time?

    In another side, how “to be or not to be” (pardon me Sir Shakespeare) can be proved? I refer to uncertainly principle electron moving and position…

    Well Drs, I have not your deep knowledge, I have not your sophysticate equipments, I only using purely reflection and pardon me again but…i only know that “nature love temperature”

    sorry poor English

    Like

  6. “This paper proposes that traveling energy quanta (mainly vacuum energy and gravitational waves, as well as neutrinos, electromagnetic waves, cosmic rays, stellar winds, and all other kinds of waves and relativistic particles yet to be discovered) accumulate in a Density Wave like mechanism around the galactic and cosmic scale structures because of Shapiro Delay. ”

    Gravitational & electromagnetic waves travel at [i]c[/i] all the other entities with mass>0 you mention travel at slower speeds. Accumulation of them all won’t happen. Heigh ho.

    Like

  7. Einstein was not correct about mass causing gravity, or about light speed limits so that both GR and SR are incorrect theories on how Universe works. However, the GMF fields or Graviton Cycle that streams into forward time VORTEX terminates in cores of Proton’s as a decentralized antimatter induction and in core of Galaxies BH cores as a centralized antimatter induction. This process is the return mechanism that powers our forward time creation and is being pulled by the reverse time antimatter paired VORTEX that is moving around a TOROID at approximately 20 billion times the speed of light. So, that we only see a fraction of the bulk of this large scale energy exchange that is in perpetual motion and cannot be destroyed because the Universe self assembles itself PERIOD. So, what is really going on operates way above the frequencies and spectrum of light, we can only see the EMF frequencies whereas the MORE POWERFUL GMF is in extreme motion and is the power source that causes both creation of mass, and the return mechanism causes a repulsive force of gravity and the vertical gravity well. This means that not only do we have it all wrong regarding the standard model of physics, but we are not even close to understanding that the entire Universe has always existed in this DUAL TIME UNIVERSE paired motion. Further, it also means that the CMB is cooling down because we are moving at extreme speeds unpacking this mega arm whereby galaxies are moving away from each other as we move away from the hot core. We are probably at least half way out from the core and will eventually arrive at the DEAD RECYCLE ZONE and then be recylced back into the large scale energy exchange. It took me 10 years to figure it out, but so far I have not seen one person on this planet that has come close to getting this clear about how our Universe works. Once we understand that Universe is totally regenerative, that a big bang event is impossible, the annihilation’s break into two directions back to either side of the energy pool with antiphotons and antigravitons streaming back towards our reverse time MIRROR reverse time partner. So, this process is eternal. It also means that SPACE is flat, it cannot be created or destroyed, it goes forever in all directions, there are no boundaries so good luck in trying to rap your head around that one. It is logically impossible for there to be any boundaries, otherwise what would be on the other side of the boundary? SPACE? So, no matter did not win out over antimatter, antimatter cannot flip back and forth between states of matter and antimatter that is impossible. LIGO did not see a GRAVITY WAVE, we may have seen left over EMF shell of the former FTL wave when these GRAVITON CONTAINMENT FIELD’S collided, but we cannot see frequencies above light speed and graviton’s are very small and operate at 20 billion times the way above the speed of light. If, we had advanced Alien technology we could use the GMF ocean that is cycling in forward time to listen to huge GRB’s or Supernova’s when they occur and communicate instantly across our Universe, but we have a long ways to go before we can gain this greater understanding but once we do we will be able to manipulate the graviton cycle and power space craft at FTL speeds without feeling any G FORCES. The Proton has only one quark and one antiquark rotating at 3.3 trillion times per second around a micro BH event horizon that terminates the forward time collapsing graviton cycle and streams antigraviton’s that are repulsive to matter back towards the reverse time VORTEX. But, to show you how inept we are in even coming close to understanding what TESLA already knew was that atoms were powered by an FTL cosmic source, and that these atoms were vortex machines powered by this outside source. Standard model is broken, based on scatterings that do not represent what is going on inside PROTONS!!!! Example, 100 broken gluon strings (HERA Collider electron/proton TEV level collisions) thrown back into proton with one quark and one antiquark at each end as if this these graviton containment field SHELLS which resemble springs are some type of parts resembling a wiring diagram. We can only see the EMF shells, while the bulk of energy operates dark, and again we can see same thing in the 50,000 light year across FERMI BUBBLES above and below ecliptic that is the FTL shock wave with x-ray and Gamma ray annihilations from antigraviton return mechanism cycling this large scale energy exchange back towards reverse time.

    Like

  8. Theories are changing with time.If we consider quantum theory of everything and M theory for universe, we have ten dimension in space time.We have to find more physical characters and more physic law.

    Like

  9. These are such thoughtful comments, I can no longer resist the forces of this page pulling on me.

    Imagine if you will that gravity does not bend light.
    Instead, it concentrates matter which, then more dense, bends the light.
    Then what happens in the equations?
    Could this remove one impediment hampering discovery of the Unified Field Theory?

    The matter might be the Higgs Boson Field, might be Dark Matter.

    And/or, the writings of a great psychologist are still used today in universities, an Austrian named Wilhelm Reich, who had moved to USA. Turned scientist, he experimented in an area that made the puritans uneasy, sex, and the profiteers uneasy, actual cures perhaps. So they locked him up and side-note, he died of course a few days before the set application for his release from a supposed “heart attack”. Why not? They’ll believe that.

    I have mixed thoughts yet believe it applies to Dark Matter.
    It is my assertion that the life energy he coined — orgone (last part rhymes with zone) — is likely the same as Dark Matter. Being cohesive, it draws more to itself. Dark Energy, itself quite smitten by Dark Matter and attracted to it. Dark Energy inhibits cohesion, it is dispersive, and the reason the universe does not collapse, yet Dark Energy is the more inventive of the two, resulting in new things being formed. The two are in a dance with each other. (This does not eliminate a Creator).

    One thing is that he misinterpreted radiation as becoming more deadly in the presence of this so-called orgone (dark matter in my hypothesis). I suggest that the orgone merely acted on his radioactive samples like oxygen to a smoldering campfire. A simple test could verify my theory on that, or put it to rest.

    When a beautiful water droplet sits on a leaf, the concentration of orgone (dark matter) that day is high. The water may lay flat on another day when dark energy is higher.

    A life-energy meter can be developed from this principle (dark-matter-vs-energy meter), possibly with simple laser reflection off of a miniscus, or more precisely, maybe the difference in interference patterns between two lasers.

    Since an accumulator was designed (acting much like a diode), since this is cohesive, one of them around the fusion test chamber for experiments should improve the fusion results.

    I have a more to add. This is a test. If this had been a real earth-shaking event, you would have been advised on where to tune in your local area for more information. Sorry, you old farts like myself will recognize parts of that. It is burned into my memory from youth. The emergency broadcast system. Sigh, those were the days. When The Twilight Zone was on TV. Who knew we would wind up living in it.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. Just a dumb old retired cop here…I’m impressed with all the language and “science,” but apparently no one can actually explain or articulate origin of the Universe…where in the heck did that constituent matter forming the Universe find its origin? I’ll let you “smart” guys in on a little secret. All that we see in the Universe, all of the constituent elements, the atom, all that is constrained by time…all find their origin in the “unseen World” or the “Spiritual World” and therefore mankind will NEVER articulate origin for origin is Spiritual and carnal man will never define it while constrained by the reality of time. The Lord Jesus Christ-Yeshua is Creator-God who created and made all that we see from elements originating in the Spiritual World for our God, Jesus Christ is Spirit.

    The Incomparable Christ (Colissians 1)

    13 For He rescued us from the [u]domain of darkness, and transferred us to the kingdom of [v]His beloved Son, in whom we have redemption, the forgiveness of sins.

    15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation. For by Him all things were created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things have been created through Him and for Him. He is before all things, and in Him all things hold together. He is also head of the body, the church; and He is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, so that He Himself will come to have first place in everything. For it was the Father’s good pleasure for all the fullness to dwell in Him, and through Him to reconcile all things to Himself, having made peace through the blood of His cross; through Him, I say, whether things on earth or things in heaven.

    (John 1)

    The Deity of Jesus Christ

    In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things came into being through Him, and apart from Him nothing came into being that has come into being. In Him was life, and the life was the Light of men. The Light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it.

    To God be the Glory…but hey, keep up the good work!

    Like

    1. If you’re a dumb cop you fit right in with the idiots they put in uniform around here. Bad enough the science community thinks expansion theory is fact and you wanna go throw destiny into the mix. That’s gonna do away with free will. You sure you want to go there? The scientists are confusing you because they haven’t a clue what they’re talking about. They need to step back and reevaluate the pieces we already have before adding in the ridiculous. No extra dimensions or multiverse is needed to describe our universe fully. These guys are relying too heavily on the math and it’s leading them down all the wrong paths. Dark matter, dark energy, gravity, black hole physics…all fully explainable. Dark energy is not causing the universe to expand, dark matter DOES interact with normal matter. Hubble screwed the science community into believing a lie and we’ve been paying dearly for 100 years because none of these guys can truly understand the genius of Einstein. I’ve been trying to open dialog with one of these schmucks for three years…you’d think they’d want possible answers, but they’re not wise enough to believe someone without a Prof. in front of their name could know more than they do. They could never be so wrong.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. the genius of einstein? he was a fraud; he stole everything from henri poincare without ever proven anything himself

        tell me … if you had the intention to steal somebody else’s ideas, where would be a great place to work? let me help you with that; why did einstein work as a low level clerk in a patent office?

        get it now?

        Like

    2. Thank you, RickyD—Much of what you describe, I contribute to, “The Void”, however, because of this affinity for such, I envision ALL entities being surrounded and encompassed by it. But, hey, I do wish to join you in a celebration of our existence as life forms within it. Stay positive!

      Like

    3. 1+1=2 which is logical, which means that logic exists, while there’s only 1 logical way to explain the believe in god; it’s an delusion

      you’re what’s called an anachronism

      Like

      1. Nah…I’m simply one who loves and adores Jesus Christ subsequent to diligently studying the evidence for Him, about Him. The most important decision mankind will make in their brief tenure upon this Earth constrained by Time is, “Who is Jesus Christ?” You’ve made yours and I’ve made mine. Have a wonderful life.

        Like

    1. I believe you wanted to say cosmic scale structures instead. Dark Matter particles existence is possible, what I am saying is that even if they exist they won’t reproduce the galactic behavior specially towards the core of the galaxies. There are other observations that dark matter particles can’t reproduce:
      https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/10/171026103110.htm
      http://www.iflscience.com/space/universe-ringing-bell/

      Click to access 9710217v1.pdf

      https://arstechnica.com/science/2017/03/dark-matter-is-missing-from-young-galaxies/

      All of which are predicted/explain with the Relativistically Accumulated Mass Equivalent mechaNism.

      The reason why Dark Matter particles are believed by cosmologists to be the correct hypothesis is because the simulations of universe formation and simulations of the observed pressure waves patterns in the Cosmic Microwave Background match observations. Both of which RAMEN should not have problems matching if simulations were performed.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. to perceive an out of the box postulate , vectors in 3 D;

        Do vector lines represent physical quantities? If yes, what are these tangible qualities, if not, what are the causal arguments for vectors observable influences?

        These quanta terms; Alpha, Beta and Gamma are used here to avoid having to invent new terminology.
        When applied to cosmological linear perturbation the vector theory simplifies quantum mechanics and can be used to describe the structure notably of the initial conditions in the universe all inclusive. There is ample evidence that the universe from its origin was a closed heterogeneous environment which submits to the natural laws of physics and set this chaotic state into motion. In order to explain the evolution of celestial matter structures it required a force to initiate coalescence. These chaotic initial conditions of a closed system were ideally suited when applied to linear motion as inferred in the “relativistic distance theory” as a push force.

        Define coalesce; – a process by which two or more separate quantum units are pushed together and make contact, held juxtaposed by a force all the while maintaining an autonomous existence.

        The universe is a collection of autonomous juxtaposed quantum units, a network influenced under a common and clearly defined force. This tangible infrastructure provides through itself a net force transferring pressure from point A to point B throughout the entire universe.

        Vector values can be used to describe the Greater Universe as a closed system. This vector theory creates a simpler model to hypothesize and extrapolate basic factors that represent functions as concerning to cosmological linear perturbation in quantum mechanics. All pressure in regards to vectors is divided and we may emphasize to understand a closed system and its fundamental function of force as natural occurrences in a plasmic environment.

        How do we know dark matter really exists?

        I believe in order to explain motion in any environment there must exist a chaotic state that is not only deterministic but in essence its’ doctrine must be that all occurrences in nature take place in accordance with natural laws.
        Hypothetically I believe alpha and beta units form dark matter plasma and by all accounts a need for its existence is undeniable. In fact, its existence infers as to how initial conditions and things visible are composed; example, velocities, celestial orbits, density, buoyancy, push theory, linear motion, how vectors function and what makes physics work are just to name a few. Quantum units cannot be viewed by any of our technologies and most likely not by any future developments. One must consider the very essences of these technologies are constructed of the very same quantum units; they simply will not be discernable.

        This vector theory is used here to represent that lines extending outwards are tangible, finite, and support analytical propositions that outward line values can not end at points that equals zero. We can interpret an extending line as tangible juxtaposed beta units extending from point A to point B; both points represented as physical values. A vector as a tool of physics can provide visual analysis, observations and how natural laws interplay with non – visible forces and impact direction and motion on visible matter.

        Note; What is intrinsic value?
        A quantum unit has in itself or for its own sake a principle value and is regarded as an end or an unchangeable in itself.
        The term quanta carries a basic value of heat that the environment arbitrarily supports as to the amount of matter contained in this unit.
        In theory, intrinsic value is not necessarily the basal state of the principles of quantum matter. In reality if Z is an intrinsic value than “Z minus” cannot be achieved, reason being the initial conditions or the environment set limitations for any further division beyond the thermal point of Z; where Z is defined as a quanta unit.
        The term “intrinsic” is a value when once reached; further division cannot contribute any value to its immediate environment, theoretically it should be possible but in reality it has no options or space.
        If one accepts the idea that intrinsic values exist, than a finite volume of the Greater Universe (G.U) requires a physical form where decay or coalescence are means to an end, this hypothesis explains two phenomena; one, the 1st L of T which states, why matter can not be created or destroyed and the second is, why the greater universe must be a three dimensional closed system. This suggests that the universe is finite and cannot contain any sized vacuum.

        Why do we need dark matter? If you want to bake a cake, if nature wants to design a human it needs quantum matter. Why? ~ 80 to 85 % of the ingredients are alpha and beta units. Another way to view alpha and beta is as extremely low thermal valued matter.
        The theory of quantum mechanics has the physical capacity to predict deterministically the behavior of a chaotic system with precise predictability. This theory when well understood would provide a proper account in a mechanical sense, how net force can influence the quanta world deterministically from the bottom up.

        We err when we divide basic systems into more then one type. It is imperative to define the physical intrinsic values of quanta as a family of properties and how they relate in the formation of the myriads of visible and non visible entities. We may presume that the basic physical properties in all systems are the same and correspond in the formation of structure but not necessarily in shape, size or function.

        In the quantum context the term observable was used as interchangeable with physical and metaphysical states, a theory nowadays by some as unacceptable. The state of space as a system rests as one physical possibility; space is quanta all inclusive, a closed system with no outside.
        These conditions are absolutely necessary for quantum mechanics to function properly; a bounded heterogeneous environment, unitary and linear quanta, a density of omega = one and contain a zero vacuum. This chaotic state is not only deterministic but in essence its’ doctrine is that all occurrences in nature take place in accordance with natural laws.
        For instance a possible description of space as represented by the mechanics of vectors show for net force to function the mass must be embedded in a long lasting plasma field. The mass is set in an environment in which internal relations among all quantum units behave in compliance with dynamic laws, ergo describes the true paths of all vectors. When you know ~ everything there is to know as provided by any local system the dynamics clearly show a state of chaos that abides by the laws of nature.

        The aim here is to show that vectors are basically active or ~ inactive in a three dimensional environment. In linear algebra, vector lines are coordinates, between points in space, therefore operations of vectors can define interactions and how lines interact in a mini universe. Vectors are lines of juxtaposed infinitesimal ~ spheres (beta) with coordinates that satisfy linear extensions and must be represented as infinitesimal measurables in a three dimensional mini universe. There are multi n – vectors along with multi n-coordinates interacting in space. This labyrinth network of intercommunicating vectors is a “simplicity wrapped in complexity”. Each quantum represents an infinitesimal force of influence but their cumulative affect; cannot be denied.

        J. Kepler’s conjecture on close packing.

        3 dimensional close packing as dark matter plasma may be confusing.

        A close packing theory can predict how alpha units as ground state properties form a plasma and how they interact with the mingling beta. Regular packing is where alpha units juxtaposed and of equal size, form a lattice; when layered as a hexagonal close packing model they form alpha plasma.
        This same theory applies where beta units juxtaposed and of equal size will in a like manner form a lattice; when layered as a hexagonal close packing model they as well form beta plasma and when intermingled they form a well defined mass. When beta plasma is intermingled with the principle alpha plasma they form a new arrangement; an arrangement that serves to produce alpha interstices. When beta lattice like sheets are embedded in alpha plasma and when overlaid with “b” covering the interstices of “a” and with each additional layer set over its underlying interstices; this repetitive sequence is defined here as an ABAB model which eventually results as a hexagonal close packing intermingled plasma. This mingling of plasmas spawns “dark matter” plasma.
        I think all structures are arrangements composed of stacked lattice like layers of quanta ~ spheres; countless configurations of motile and immotile systems in our universe are the aftereffects of “irregular” close packing.
        This ~ infinite sequence will lay out a description as to how a mini universe may truly appear.
        The clump mass which I describe here is a coalescence of baryon particles embedded in an existing hexagonal close packing model, (dark matter plasma). Sphere packing here describes a juxtaposed arrangement of alpha and beta units in an ABAB model, embedding the clump mass in this intermingled plasma. Each alpha and beta lattice extends to the full extent of a mini universe followed by a second layer and third to beyond calculable, this postulate eventually lays open to a theory of a three dimensional dark matter matrix, embedding all baryon mass. We can define the density of this matrix in its surrounding environment as identical with that of greater universe all-inclusive as omega = one. Embedded within the plasma lies a wealth of information on the nature of vectors, their function, density of space and the three dimensional mapping of alpha and beta units as DM plasma.

        The prototype which I describe here is vector mapping; how dark matter constructs a three dimensional close packing model with countless lattice like layers ultimately embedding all mass. Each hexagonal close packing lattice stretches out across the full extent of space only to be interrupted by scattered clump matter throughout the mini universe. We must be aware it is the mass volume through coalescences or decay that change; the matrix itself is long lasting and the density is constant.

        Linear 3 Dimensional Packing for vector influence may be confusing.

        A chaotic theory may explicate the relativity pertinent to initial conditions, quantum units, their mechanics, disorder, heterogeneity and with sound reason define how “open systems” function in a “closed system”.
        Pressure is the total force as applied by quantum units to a mass area from all directions perpendicularly to the surface of said mass in question. It is simpler to demonstrate on a two dimensional beta lattice the pressure pathways. However in space the true form is a 3 dimensional model with many more vector lines interjecting and affecting the force in each individual unit, particle or mass. It is a logical summation that the trajectories of linear forces will alter / modulate as they transfer from one beta unit to the next adjacent beta unit.

        Direction of movement

        A lower value indicates the direction of moving towards, while the force motion is subject to the “relativistic distance theory” as a push force. It is not incorrect to say “the pressure is directed from the higher to the lower pressure”. The pressure at equilibrium has no direction or motion. Sufficient force or pressure with e – equilibrated vector diametric lines will have direction and motion. This 3 dimensional spheroid model is constructed as juxtaposing beta units transfer pressure through touching boundaries.

        Relativistic distance is the distance between two baryon objects in a relatively close proximity to each other. Hypothetically when two baryon objects (big or miniscule) embedded in DM plasma are close enough to each other in space, an e – equilibrium is created and the normal force directly between the two objects weakens. What RD has managed to accomplish is unequal beta pressure between the inner facing surfaces as opposed to their diametric outer surfaces. At a normal state objects in space would experience ~ equal pressure to the entire surface, but e-equilibrium infers a state in which all of the vectors on these objects are NOT balancing each other out as such, that there is a net effect there and the net force does NOT equal zero.

        Vectors line values may be confusing.

        In reality there are a vast number of vectors acting on a sphere or any shaped object but for this purpose we will use the term “ ~ incalculable”. Since everything tangible is three dimensional; vectors can be considered as beta units extending outwards. Hypnotically many diametric vectors lines will ultimately be unbalanced and present us with baffling conclusions. The basic principles of net force are explicitly determined by the law of “relativistic distance” for each vector and its diametric counter part.

        In theory a vector is a physical linear pathway for pressure, the requirements for initial conditions in this environment are; heterogeneity, a density of omega one, juxtaposed quanta, unitary motion and an absolute absence of vacuum. Forces in the universe have perpetual existence and will activate as a result of e – equilibrium between objects when found at relativistic distances. Newton’s 1st law of motion infers that when unbalanced forces such as vectors do not cancel each out, will initiate movement. Force as motion is not only deterministic but in essence its’ doctrine is that all occurrences in nature take place in accordance with natural laws.

        Both a magnitude quantity and direction must be specified for basic vector operations. Defining directions and magnitudes of each directional arrow, we can then assume by denoting one end of the arrow as A and the tip as B; this vector line represents the two points. For a vector to introduce a force the diametrical vector lines must engage tangibles at all points. If “A” is a celestial point “B” must be one of two things, either another celestial object or some distant point as the “periphery” of the Mini universe. Thusly this vector line recognizes the absolute values of both A and B.

        Point B vectors when logically presumptive values are applied with zero being false and non- zero true the resultant must be a tangible point; B will be a tangible periphery, (if a mini universe is an open system). Linear vectors work by the same principles of physics, force as motion is not only deterministic but in essence its’ doctrine is that all occurrences in nature take place in accordance with natures’ laws.

        Hypothetically when two objects acting as partial shields are embedded in dark matter plasma and are close enough to each other in space an e – equilibrium of forces is initiated and the normal force directly between the two objects weakens. What the RD theory has managed to accomplish is unequal beta pressure between the inner facing surfaces as opposed to their diametric outer surfaces. At the normal state the objects in space would experience ~ equal pressure to the entire surface, but e – equilibrium infers a state in which all of the external forces on the objects are NOT balancing each other out, as such that there is a net effect there and the net force does NOT equal zero.

        The sum of vector forces acting on a mass is total force or net force. Force is a vector quantity which means, the direction of motion is the resultant of an unbalance force as applied directly between diametrically opposing vectors lines. In order for vector points to initiate movement a vector must show an imbalance between diametrical vectors. Net force is the overall force acting on a mass and a resultant force is a force that describes a difference by which quantum mechanics can initiates motion.

        This effect or resultant force is introduced when two masses in an environment find themselves at relativistic distances as related to each other. A vector resultant of linear directions that lead to the object of point B diminishes exponentially but theoretically never to zero. It is clear from the statement above that the vectors’ desired objective is to execute by design using beta plasma, distance, magnitude or physical impedance.

        In conclusion

        The theory of quantum mechanics has the physical capacity to predict deterministically the behavior of a chaotic system with precise predictability. This theory when well understood would provide a proper account in a mechanical sense, how net force can influence the quanta world deterministically from the bottom up.

        Sam Sade
        http://darkmattertheories.com/index.html

        Like

      2. Exactly! Dark matter can’t only exist on the outskirts of galaxy. The curve anomaly is a frequency anomaly, not missing magic. The Shapiro delay is likely candidate, but there are probably multiple incorrect parameters in Lambda cosmology.

        Liked by 1 person

      3. The ultimate all energetic status is in unreachable true emptiness. Dark matter, dark energy and dark ambiance, with all their cousins space and time are the same ingredient in different status.

        Liked by 1 person

  11. Thank you so much for authoring Gravitational “Anomalies” Caused by Shapiro Delayed Traveling Energy
    Quanta Around Galactic and Cosmic Scale Structures !
    Surely another thing I have been previously searching for website for
    ages! Are you planning to distribute a few more the
    same?

    Liked by 1 person

  12. Findings of the distant space realities through observation must be credited to Astronomers with no arguments. But defining them in many different angles must be open for all those who are interested in. As far as I have realised, as a liberal explorer, the ringlike thing in the picture exhibits beginning of a new galaxy in the space by expansion of dark matter in to hydrogen. The dynamics behind is a centrifugal spherical vortex and the hydrogen cloud is spread out like a ring due to centrifugal force of rotary dynamics.
    The second phase of formation to be executed by Gravity by attracting the hydrogen cloud in to clusters which can be addressed as decentralisation of matter. Pressure goes up at cluster centres due to gravity and hydrogen starts form helium through nuclear fusion. That is the emerge of new stars to the world and separate rotary dynamics formed about stars through spherical vortex.

    Third phase is to form solar systems with time. Helium ions are gradually accumulated in stars and formed in to Magma creating a thick liquid crust around the core of a Sun. Meanwhile a globe of dark matter too is grown gradually at the mid of the spherical vortex of the highest rotary dynamics. At the stage when hydrogen is no more adequate to give energy for the nuclear fusion, the spherical vortex is reversed making a big pressure at the core. That is because the dark matter globe formed in the star tends to expand again in to hydrogen and then the star is explored. Magma in the crust is projected out with the keeping of the same rotation and a planetary system is born gradually by cooling. Hydro-static spherical shape of planets is caused by self gravity.

    However this process is very long to explain and please refer ‘Star Mechanism’ under ‘Space Dynamics’ at for more.

    To conclude the writing I would like to say the scientific world has stepped too far by standing upon some faulty theorizations while some fundamental realities remain still unexplained. For an instant, Gravity has not yet been defined in a world convention for acceptance. Some says it is curvature of space time while some believe it as a result of quantum energy. I am saying both concepts are faulty and Gravity has a more simple basis of a FM wave born due to contentious vibration of the atomic mass. (pl ref ‘Mechanism of Gravity’ under ‘Space Dynamics-V2/2009’ at )

    To sum up, a galaxy is a separate Universe and it is born by expansion of dark matter(neutron mass) in to Hydrogen. In contrary, Old galaxies starts contracting, in exhibition of Einstein’s concept of pendulum type of reversible dynamics, in to dark mater again by reversing of the spherical vortex.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Cyril–Thank you for reminding us that our projections are in need of some “shoring up” before we proceed much further. Good points, great policy!

      Like

      1. Yet nothing on disproving expansion…I can help you with your questions pertaining to the universe if you wish. All you need do is ask.

        Like

  13. Let us assume Einstein was correct in his theory (educated guess) of relativity. Let us also assume the theory was in it’s infancy. There is one thing missing in order for us to bring his work into the 21st century…a clear understanding of what we know and what we THINK we know. Viewed from the correct perspective one can accurately determine the nature of dark matter and debunk this theory of expansion…One might even be able to explain ‘gravity’ more efficiently.

    Liked by 3 people

  14. There is no gravitational time dilation (GTD). Shapiro’s experiment is false. New evidence has been found in the year 2010; Einstein had no idea on the basic of astronomy. Einstein’s hypothesis of general relativity is not valid. Einstein’s hypothesis can not be proven or tested in anyway whatsoever.

    The entire experiments that say ‘general relativity is correct’, ‘Einstein was right again’, ‘Einstein wins again’ are the cases of knowing the result they wanted to get; or the result is misinterpretation.

    Three books have been published about the fact of Einstein’s relativity:
    1.Eclipse 1919 and the general relativity theory (2014)
    2.Albert Einstein Failed in Three Classical Tests (2016)
    3.Logical Fallacies of Special and General Theory of Relativity (2017)

    Like

    1. I believe the only mistake Einstein made was to assume the CC was a blunder. If cosmologists wish to understand what they see, they should try returning my offers to help. They’d be amazed what I can teach them.

      Like

  15. There are no gravitational time dilation (GTD). Shapiro’s experiment is false.New evidence has been found in the year 2010, Einstein had no idea on the basic astronomy. Einstein’s hypothesis of general relativity is not valid. Einstein’s hypothesis can not be proven or tested in anyway whatsoever. The entire experiments that say ‘general relativity is correct’ are the cases of knowing the result they wanted to get; or misinterpretation.

    Three books has been published reveal the fact about Einstein’s relativity:

    1.Eclipse 1919 and the general relativity theory (2014)

    2.Albert Einstein Failed in Three Classical Tests (2016)

    3.Logical Fallacies of Special and General Theory of Relativity (2017)

    Like

  16. In fact all that is real, but the truth is, all the energy is in what we call emptiness, one ounce of emptiness could contain the energy that will delivers thousands of Univers. Paradoxically, the value of emptiness is simultaneously negative at aprx. 10 -17 and 10+++.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Не надо из одной крайности бросаться в иную. Не спешите забывать формулу E=mc²/2.
      То есть – детское, нет – младенческое и скорее хитро намеренное преувеличение – ваша унция Эфира. Скорее поймёте ошибку и запомнится, если пересчитаете унцию материи в Энергию, в Пустоту. Не теряйте поручень материализма.
      Но прежде прыгните с Пизанской трубы. https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%94%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BB%D1%96%D0%B4_%D0%93%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%96%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%8F_%D0%B7_%D0%BF%D0%B0%D0%B4%D1%96%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F%D0%BC_%D1%82%D1%96%D0%BB#.D0.97.D0.BD.D0.B0.D1.87.D0.B5.D0.BD.D0.BD.D1.8F_.D0.B4.D0.BE.D1.81.D0.BB.D1.96.D0.B4.D1.83 Не откладывайте, Вики сейсмит, там есть две статьи – Маженов и Ву.
      А это можете уточнять или ругать, критика полезна истинному поиску. а не заматыванию за хот-дог правды. http://samlib.ru/k/kozlow_a_i/wirtsfery.shtml Опорные виртуальные сферы космических шаров 54k “Новый ракУрс проблем”
      +Устойчивое своеобразие Пизанской башни http://zhurnal.lib.ru/k/kozlow_a_i/pizza.shtml

      Like

  17. Ok,? Lee stated and then he st᧐pped andd thought. ?The very best factor about Gоd iss ???
    hmmmm?????..? He puzzled as a result of he had so many things that haѵe been ɡreat about God but he
    wanted to pik the very best one sο he would wiin the game.
    ?That he is aware ⲟf everything. That?s really cool.

    Meaning he maү help me with my homework.? Larгy concluded witrh
    a prⲟud expression on hhis face.

    Like

Leave a comment