“ON THE NATURE OF DARK ENERGY AND GRAVITY”

“ON THE NATURE OF DARK ENERGY AND GRAVITY”

by Jose Gregorio Baquero

2017

 

Dark Energy and Gravity Qualitative Analysis

Dark Energy is by far the largest contributor to the universe total energy density. It is radically different to any other phenomenon in nature that we have some familiarity with the exception of Gravity. It is not that we understand gravity but at least we are familiar with it. Dark Energy quanta is emitted on each quantum of spacetime and its density is constant in space (it may change in time); likewise Gravity quanta  can be “emitted” from any quantum of spacetime but in contrast its “emitted” value varies depending on how much energy density that point of space time is been crossed by. Lastly, Dark Energy is responsible for the expansion of the universe by stretching in equal proportions the spacetime fabric; it is the creator of new space. On the other hand Gravity compresses the spacetime fabric; it is the compressor of existing space.

Let’s suppose that the quanta of Dark Energy, Darktons, move in the 3 spatial dimensions and the one time dimension (s=3,t=1). Like gravitational waves, their movement can be visualized as expanding spherical objects in spacetime (similar to how sound waves, shock waves, and pressure waves propagate). The Darkton radius would increase at causality speed (c). In contrast photons, bosons, all matter particles, (galaxies, stars, planets, atoms, fermions) move in one spatial dimension (straight lines on curved space-time) and one time dimension (s=1,t=1). Even though you can navigate 3 dimensional spaces you do so by moving on just one spatial dimension at a time.

Now we could infer that quanta of the Gravitational Energy, Gravitons, would also move in the 3 spatial dimensions and the one time dimension(s=3,t=1).

Darktons and Gravitons nature would make them almost impossible to detect experimentally with current technology since the detectors are designed to detect particles moving in s=1,t=1. It is uncertain at this time if this idea and others inspired by it will set the bases for a new technology that eventually can detect them.

What Would be the Relativistic Equivalent Mass for Entities that Move in s=3,t=1?

We can derive the kinetic energy for entities that move in s=3,t=1 using the work-energy theorem and adding Newton’s second law of motion. The variation on the kinetic energy for an object that moves symmetrically and simultaneously in s=3,t-=1 would be the work done by a force on a volume of a sphere U while its volume varies:

 Kinetic Energy Revised

Following the steps to how  is derived from the apparent change in mass for an object moving at a constant speed in one spatial dimension and one time dimension (s=1,t-=1) we can infer that the mass of an object moving in 3 spatial dimensions and one time dimension (s=3,t=1) apparently changes as:energy-equivalence

dark-energy-equivalence

Could this Solve the Cosmological Constant Problem i.e. Vacuum Catastrophe (in part)?

 It seems that because Einstein removed his cosmological constant from his field equations after Hubble’s discovery of the expanding universe it was forgotten for a while. Cosmologist put it back to its place when Dark Energy was discovered. For the new scientists the misreading of the nature of Dark Energy (Leffert’s, E(vac) different to mc^2)gets them Vacuum Energy Density results that are (c^2)/k times smaller than they actually should be (in joules/cubic meter). The problem would be difficult to spot because without understanding this energy nature, the tools by which all cosmological results would be calculated would get deformed results in equal proportions and nothing weird is perceived; that is until confronted with predictions and calculations from QED, SED and other scenarios (Margan’s “Estimating the Vacuum Energy Density”). 

 

Final Thoughts

There would be several revisions needed in current accepted cosmology based on the findings of this hypothesis. Also, the nature of the Quantum of Dark Energy (Darkton) and that of Gravity (Graviton) could be that of the same entity and the whole Dark Energy-Gravity relationship would be a case of emission-absorption by the quantum of spacetime. If that would not be the case, for the purpose of this article the graviton as negative energy carrier would suffice the author’s intellectual curiosity temporarily. Einstein was right and his finding keep continue to enlighten our understanding of the universe.

 

References:

 1          Einstein, A. (1905), “Ist die Trägheit eines Körpers von seinem Energieinhalt abhängig?”, Annalen der Physik, English Version

2          Einstein, A. “Relativity: the Special and General Theory by Albert Einstein”.               Project Gutenberg. 2

3          Leffert, C.” Resolution of the Vacuum Energy Problem”. https://arxiv.org/ftp/astro-ph/papers/0308/0308014.pdf

4          Margan, E.”Estimating the Vacuum Energy Density”. http://www-f9.ijs.si/~margan/Articles/vacuum_energy_density.pdf

5          https://www.integral-calculator.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

14 thoughts on ““ON THE NATURE OF DARK ENERGY AND GRAVITY”

  1. Accumulated Time Dilation (ATD) due to the General Theory of Relativity has been almost entirely ignored throughout our scientific history. Even though Satellites require altered clocks to adjust for this, the “cosmic long term” effects of ATD have also been entirely ignored. See my website, which also agrees with your theory and adds numerous other effects of ATD. time-factor-theory.com

    Like

  2. “To understand your own ignorance is the beginning of knowledge”.
    Good post. I honestly don’t understand much of it, but the concepts are still worth following. The speed of causality is an interesting idea. What is it?

    Liked by 1 person

  3. You state: Dark Energy is responsible for the expansion of the universe by stretching in equal proportions the spacetime fabric; it is the creator of new space. On the other hand Gravity compresses the spacetime fabric; it is the compressor of existing space.

    I recently heard the following in a documentary: Dark energy has a number and when plugged into E=MC^2 and rearranged, you get the missing mass that dark matter couldn’t account for. (Quoted precisely)

    Can you tie this into your statement?

    Like

    1. Einstein Field equations show how it is energy what curves space time. Mass is a measure of how much energy a body has. All gravity in the universe is due to the presence of energy. Therefore not only regular mass (including neutrinos)generates gravity but also all the other forms of energy. Since Dark Energy is the main contributor for the total energy of the universe it is the main contributor to the total gravity of the universe.
      In the intergalactic space Dark Energy is uniformly distributed and its gravitational pull is uniform in all directions not causing accelerations; close to galaxies and cluster of galaxies Dark Energy density gets denser due to the Relativistically Accumulated Mass-Energy mechanism. Gravitational acceleration attributed to Dark Matter can be observed then around cosmic structures due to the Dark Energy concentration differential.

      Like

      1. “Dark Energy is by far the largest contributor to the universe total energy density. It is radically different to any other phenomenon in nature that we have some familiarity with the exception of Gravity.”
        I find YOUR comment very perspicacious in nature due to the fact that there ARE phenomena out there that we can’t satisfactorily explain. Nevertheless, it’s there and though we can’t comprehend it, much less explain it, it affects every human beings’ life that has ever lived, lives and will live.
        Right now, the discussion is on the tangible side of the argument. But the intangible will be known sooner than we realize.
        Thank You.

        Liked by 1 person

  4. The Universe is a Quaternion space ala Hamilton, [r,V].
    W=[c,V][,P]=[-vp,cP]=
    W=[-mGM/r,cP]
    Dark energy =cP, the vector energy.
    Stationary Universe
    0=XW=[d/dr,Del][-vp,cP]
    0=[vp/r – cp/r, cdP/dr – Del vp]
    0=[vp/r – cp/r, mdV/dt + muR/r^3]
    Universe is Stationary not expanding. Hubble did not believe redshift indicated doppler.
    Ho=c/R=c/cT=1/T.
    62km/s/Mpc=c/R gives R=150GPm.

    Dark matter effect is cP and electromagnetism. Stars are charged and rotating and moving charges create magnetic field B.
    F=q[c,V][,B]=q[,cB + VxB]
    qVxB=VxP/r gives.
    P=mV=qBr and V=qBr/m=quI/m
    V=25e/3m uI this is the homopolar motor, wattmeter!

    Electrons flowing into the Galaxy causes the over gravity rotation.
    See The Universe is Electric on Amazon by Wardell Lindsay.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s